|
-
DTS update command
I have a as400 at main office and I need to get information from there to sql 2000 server here at my office. I was able to get the information yet I can't get the updated or changed information. I would like to get it every 15 minutes to update\change my existing table here at my office.
This is my query.
SELECT ORDHFILE.OABL, ORDTFILE.ODLOTSEQ, ORDHFILE.OACUSTPO, ORDHFILE.OABLDATE, ORDHFILE.OAREGN, ORDHFILE.OASHIPDTMM, ORDHFILE.OASHIPDTDD, ORDHFILE.OASHIPDTYY, ORDHFILE.OASHIPVIA, ORDHFILE.OAFOB, ORDHFILE.OAATTN, CUSTFIL2.COBILLNUM, CUSTFIL2.COCNTRY, ORDHFILE.OASFNAME, ORDHFILE.OASFAD1, ORDHFILE.OASFAD2, ORDHFILE.OASFCITY, ORDHFILE.OASFST, ORDHFILE.OASFZIP, ORDHFILE.OASFZIP2, ORDHFILE.OASTNAME, ORDHFILE.OASTAD1, ORDHFILE.OASTAD2, ORDHFILE.OASTCITY, ORDHFILE.OASTST, ORDHFILE.OASTZIP, ORDHFILE.OADESC1, ORDHFILE.OAOPID, ORDTFILE.ODPNUM, PRODFIL2.PUPNAME1, PRODFIL2.PUPNAME2, ORDTFILE.ODQORD, ORDTFILE.ODMEAS, ORDTFILE.ODUM, ORDTFILE.ODCSC, ORDREM.OCCPREM1, ORDREM.OCCPREM2, ORDREM.OCCPREM3, ORDREM.OCCPREM4, ORDREM.OCCPREM5, ORDREM.OCCPREM6, ORDREM.OCCPREM7, ORDREM.OCCPREM8, ORDREM.OCCPREM9, ORDREM.OCCPREM10, ORDREM.OCCPREM11, ORDREM.OCCPREM12
FROM B108FFCC.CHEMPAXSNF.CUSTFIL2 CUSTFIL2, B108FFCC.CHEMPAXSNF.ORDHFILE ORDHFILE, B108FFCC.CHEMPAXSNF.ORDTFILE ORDTFILE, B108FFCC.CHEMPAXSNF.PRODFIL2 PRODFIL2, B108FFCC.CHEMPAXSNF.ORDREM ORDREM
WHERE (((ORDHFILE.OAWHS)='19') AND ((CUSTFIL2.COCNUM)=(ORDHFILE.OACNUM)) AND ((ORDTFILE.ODBL)=(ORDHFILE.OABL)) AND ((PRODFIL2.PUPNUM)=(ORDTFILE.ODPNUM)) AND ((ORDREM.OCBL)=(ORDHFILE.OABL)) AND ((ORDREM.OCPNUM)=(ORDTFILE.ODPNUM)) AND ((ORDREM.OCMEAS)=(ORDTFILE.ODMEAS)))
ORDER BY ORDHFILE.OABL, ORDTFILE.ODLOTSEQ
I am new to scripting so I have no idea how to get it to update. When I run it now, it gives me an error about duplicate rows exist.
Can anyone help????
-
bring this data to a temporary table and then when you insert use PKColumn NOT in (select PKcolumnn from your maintable)
-
Quick Question: RE: Full Writeover or Incremental Update
Is this a case where a full writeover might be more efficient than 1) determining differences and 2) incrementally updating where appropriate? The latter option, of course, takes more steps, but I'd have to understand the requirement to determine whether historical details and so forth need to be maintained in the target...
Bill
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|