|
-
SQL Server 7.0 problems
How does everyone feel about SQL Server 7.0 so far? Has anyone ran into serious problems with the quality of the product?
-
SQL Server 7.0 problems (reply)
I've been running production for almost a month now, and I spent a considerable amount of time working with beta 3. The only problems I have encountered with SQL 7.0 have been with replication.
As for the quality of the product, what do you want a comparison to? I think SQL 7.0 is a dream as far as ease of use and performance compared to 6.5. Comparing Microsoft SQL Server to Oracle/Unix is another story altogether.
Anthony B. Kenitzki
On 2/2/99 5:13:37 PM, Tony Maggard wrote:
> How does everyone feel about SQL Server 7.0 so far? Has anyone ran into
> serious problems with the quality of the product?
-
SQL Server 7.0 problems (reply)
On 2/2/99 6:21:54 PM, Anthony B. Kenitzki wrote:
>
I've been running production for almost a month now, and I spent a
> considerable amount of time working with beta 3. The only problems I have
> encountered with SQL 7.0 have been with replication.
As for the quality
> of the product, what do you want a comparison to? I think SQL 7.0 is a
> dream as far as ease of use and performance compared to 6.5. Comparing
> Microsoft SQL Server to Oracle/Unix is another story altogether.
Anthony
> B. Kenitzki
On 2/2/99 5:13:37 PM, Tony Maggard wrote:
> How does
> everyone feel about SQL Server 7.0 so far? Has anyone ran into
> serious
> problems with the quality of the product?
-
SQL Server 7.0 problems (reply)
Sorry for the other empty message. Could you identify what replication problems you've been running into, and why you think Oracle/UNIX or Oracle/NT might be a better product? We're considering Oracle vs Microsoft... Thanks a bunch.
On 2/2/99 6:21:54 PM, Anthony B. Kenitzki wrote:
>
I've been running production for almost a month now, and I spent a
> considerable amount of time working with beta 3. The only problems I have
> encountered with SQL 7.0 have been with replication.
As for the quality
> of the product, what do you want a comparison to? I think SQL 7.0 is a
> dream as far as ease of use and performance compared to 6.5. Comparing
> Microsoft SQL Server to Oracle/Unix is another story altogether.
Anthony
> B. Kenitzki
On 2/2/99 5:13:37 PM, Tony Maggard wrote:
> How does
> everyone feel about SQL Server 7.0 so far? Has anyone ran into
> serious
> problems with the quality of the product?
-
SQL Server 7.0 problems (reply)
On 2/2/99 5:13:37 PM, Tony Maggard wrote:
> How does everyone feel about SQL Server 7.0 so far? Has anyone ran into
> serious problems with the quality of the product?
-
SQL Server 7.0 problems (reply)
On 2/2/99 5:13:37 PM, Tony Maggard wrote:
> How does everyone feel about SQL Server 7.0 so far? Has anyone ran into
> serious problems with the quality of the product?
-
SQL Server 7.0 problems (reply)
IMO, Oracle is still far superior to SQL Server
On 2/2/99 5:13:37 PM, Tony Maggard wrote:
> How does everyone feel about SQL Server 7.0 so far? Has anyone ran into
> serious problems with the quality of the product?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Reply With Quote